From Inductive to Deductive: LLMs-Based Qualitative Data Analysis in Requirements Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19384v1
• Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:21:52 GMT
• Title: From Inductive to Deductive: LLMs-Based Qualitative Data Analysis in Requirements Engineering
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve qualitative data analysis tasks in Requirements Engineering (RE)<n>We show that GPT-4 achieves substantial agreement with human analysts in deductive settings, with Cohen's Kappa scores exceeding 0.7, while zero-shot performance remains limited.<n>These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to support QDA in RE by reducing manual effort while maintaining annotation quality.
• Score: 0.7874708385247352
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Requirements Engineering (RE) is essential for developing complex and regulated software projects. Given the challenges in transforming stakeholder inputs into consistent software designs, Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) provides a systematic approach to handling free-form data. However, traditional QDA methods are time-consuming and heavily reliant on manual effort. In this paper, we explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), including GPT-4, Mistral, and LLaMA-2, to improve QDA tasks in RE. Our study evaluates LLMs' performance in inductive (zero-shot) and deductive (one-shot, few-shot) annotation tasks, revealing that GPT-4 achieves substantial agreement with human analysts in deductive settings, with Cohen's Kappa scores exceeding 0.7, while zero-shot performance remains limited. Detailed, context-rich prompts significantly improve annotation accuracy and consistency, particularly in deductive scenarios, and GPT-4 demonstrates high reliability across repeated runs. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to support QDA in RE by reducing manual effort while maintaining annotation quality. The structured labels automatically provide traceability of requirements and can be directly utilized as classes in domain models, facilitating systematic software design.

Related papers

• Qiskit Code Migration with LLMs [0.13683072934528265]
  This paper proposes a hybrid approach integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to automate the migration of Qiskit code across versions.<n>The proposed methodology enhances the precision and reliability of migration suggestions by leveraging an automatically generated taxonomy of migration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T12:40:43Z)
• SWE-QA-Pro: A Representative Benchmark and Scalable Training Recipe for Repository-Level Code Understanding [41.98672557723593]
  We introduce SWEQA-Pro, a benchmark constructed from diverse, long-tail repositories with executable environments.<n>We also propose a scalable synthetic data pipeline that powers a two-stage training recipe: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)<n> Empirically, a Qwen3-8B model trained with our recipe surpasses GPT-4o by 2.3 points on SWE-QA-Pro and substantially narrows the gap to state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T05:12:48Z)
• TraceLLM: Leveraging Large Language Models with Prompt Engineering for Enhanced Requirements Traceability [4.517933493143603]
  This paper introduces TraceLLM, a framework for enhancing requirements traceability through prompt engineering and demonstration selection.<n>We assess prompt generalization and robustness using eight state-of-the-art LLMs on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T14:29:13Z)
• What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic Study [59.44848132298657]
  Post-training quantization (PTQ) usually comes with the cost of large accuracy drops, especially for reasoning tasks under low-bit settings.<n>In this study, we present a systematic empirical study of quantization-aware training (QAT) for reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:22:29Z)
• A Generalizable Framework for Building Executable Domain-Specific LLMs under Data Scarcity: Demonstration on Semiconductor TCAD Simulation [20.174394305112198]
  We present a framework for building compact, executable domain-specific LLMs in low-resource settings.<n>We demonstrate the framework by instantiating TcadGPT for semiconductor Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD)<n>Using 1.5M synthetic QA pairs and an IR-driven DPO dataset, TcadGPT attains 85.6% semantic accuracy and an 80.0% syntax pass rate on SDE executability tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T07:13:34Z)
• SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling [70.01883340129204]
  Single-Pass.<n>with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE)<n>Novel structured framework that enables single-pass, per-step annotation by aligning each solution step to one or multiple steps in a reference solution, accompanied by explicit reasoning for evaluation.<n>SPARE achieves competitive performance on challenging mathematical datasets while offering 2.6 times greater efficiency, requiring only 38% of the runtime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T14:37:59Z)
• Teaching Large Language Models to Maintain Contextual Faithfulness via Synthetic Tasks and Reinforcement Learning [80.27561080938747]
  We propose a systematic framework, CANOE, to improve the faithfulness of large language models (LLMs) in both short-form and long-form generation tasks without human annotations.<n>Also, we propose Dual-GRPO, a rule-based reinforcement learning method that includes three tailored rule-based rewards derived from synthesized short-form QA data.<n> Experimental results show that CANOE greatly improves the faithfulness of LLMs across 11 different downstream tasks, even outperforming the most advanced LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T10:10:07Z)
• A LoRA-Based Approach to Fine-Tuning LLMs for Educational Guidance in Resource-Constrained Settings [0.0]
  This study describes a cost-effective method for adapting large language models (LLMs) for academic advising with study-abroad contexts in mind.<n>After training, this study demonstrated a reduction in training loss by 52.7%, 92% accuracy in domain-specific recommendations, and a median run-rate of 100 samples per second on off-the-shelf GPU equipment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T06:08:13Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility. This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance. We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models [59.861013614500024]
  This paper explores enhancing critique abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce SCRIT, a framework that trains LLMs with self-generated data to evolve their critique abilities.<n>Our analysis reveals that SCRIT's performance scales positively with data and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T05:51:52Z)
• Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark [62.58869921806019]
  We propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a new training dataset. We design innovative training strategies to effectively distill GPT-4o's evaluation capabilities into a 7B open-source MLLM, MiniCPM-V-2.6. Experimental results demonstrate that our distilled open-source MLLM significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o-base baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T08:06:06Z)
• Embedding Self-Correction as an Inherent Ability in Large Language Models for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning [13.082135438792475]
  Chain of Self-Correction embeds self-correction as an inherent ability in Large Language Models. CoSC operates through a sequence of self-correction stages. Experiments show that CoSC significantly boosts performance on standard mathematical datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:16:44Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning [20.715106330314605]
  We propose a novel self-reasoning framework aimed at improving the reliability and traceability of RALMs.<n>The framework involves constructing self-reason trajectories with three processes: a relevance-aware process, an evidence-aware selective process, and a trajectory analysis process.<n>We have evaluated our framework across four public datasets to demonstrate the superiority of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T09:05:10Z)
• LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit [55.73370804397226]
  Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating large language models. We present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T11:49:05Z)
• Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models [46.1232919707345]
  This paper explores the efficacy of PEFT-based quantized models, employing classification or regression head, to fine-tune language models for automatic grading and feedback generation. The results show that prediction of grade scores via finetuned LLMs are highly accurate, achieving less than 3% error in grade percentage on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T16:13:54Z)
• TAT-LLM: A Specialized Language Model for Discrete Reasoning over Tabular and Textual Data [73.29220562541204]
  We consider harnessing the amazing power of language models (LLMs) to solve our task. We develop a TAT-LLM language model by fine-tuning LLaMA 2 with the training data generated automatically from existing expert-annotated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T04:28:50Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Small Language Models in Knowledge-Intensive Tasks [90.11273439036455]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in knowledge-intensive reasoning tasks. We propose Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation (KARD), a novel method that fine-tunes small LMs to generate rationales from LLMs with augmented knowledge retrieved from an external knowledge base. We empirically show that KARD significantly improves the performance of small T5 and GPT models on the challenging knowledge-intensive reasoning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T13:00:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.