Implementation of AI in Precision Medicine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14194v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:55:15 GMT
• Title: Implementation of AI in Precision Medicine
• Authors: Göktuğ Bender, Samer Faraj, Anand Bhardwaj,
• Abstract summary: This paper provides a scoping review of literature on the implementation of AI in precision medicine.<n>We identify key barriers and enablers across data quality, clinical reliability, workflow integration, and governance.<n>We propose future directions to support trustworthy and sustainable implementation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly central to precision medicine by enabling the integration and interpretation of multimodal data, yet implementation in clinical settings remains limited. This paper provides a scoping review of literature from 2019-2024 on the implementation of AI in precision medicine, identifying key barriers and enablers across data quality, clinical reliability, workflow integration, and governance. Through an ecosystem-based framework, we highlight the interdependent relationships shaping real-world translation and propose future directions to support trustworthy and sustainable implementation.

Related papers

• MedAD-R1: Eliciting Consistent Reasoning in Interpretible Medical Anomaly Detection via Consistency-Reinforced Policy Optimization [46.65200216642429]
  We introduce MedAD-38K, the first large-scale, multi-modal, and multi-center benchmark for MedAD featuring diagnostic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations alongside structured Visual Question-Answering (VQA) pairs.<n>Our proposed model, MedAD-R1, achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the MedAD-38K benchmark, outperforming strong baselines by more than 10%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T07:56:10Z)
• Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health [72.85175110624736]
  Current approaches to evaluating AI tools in mental health care are fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience.<n>This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:55:10Z)
• An AI Implementation Science Study to Improve Trustworthy Data in a Large Healthcare System [1.6881002551798014]
  This study presents an AI implementation case study within Shriners Childrens (SCs), a large multisite pediatric system.<n>We introduce a Python-based data quality assessment tool compatible with SCs infrastructure, extending OHDsi's R/Java-based Data Quality Dashboard.<n>We also compare systematic and case-specific AI implementation strategies for Craniofacial Microsomia (CFM) using the FHIR standard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T14:21:16Z)
• A Model-Driven Engineering Approach to AI-Powered Healthcare Platforms [0.03262230127283451]
  We introduce a model driven engineering (MDE) framework designed specifically for healthcare AI.<n>The framework relies on formal metamodels, domain-specific languages, and automated transformations to move from high level specifications to running software.<n>We evaluate this approach in a multi center cancer immunotherapy study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T12:00:12Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems [55.67299586253951]
  We present the first comprehensive survey of clinical mental health datasets relevant to the training and development of AI-powered clinical assistants.<n>Our survey identifies critical gaps such as a lack of longitudinal data, limited cultural and linguistic representation, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and a lack of modalities in synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T13:42:35Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Enhancing Clinical Decision-Making: Integrating Multi-Agent Systems with Ethical AI Governance [1.0195618602298682]
  We compare novel agent system designs that use modular agents to analyze laboratory results, vital signs, and clinical context.<n>We implement our agent system with the eICU database, including running lab analysis, vitals-only interpreters, and contextual reasoners agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T05:32:43Z)
• Launching Insights: A Pilot Study on Leveraging Real-World Observational Data from the Mayo Clinic Platform to Advance Clinical Research [15.04629464273677]
  The Mayo Clinic Platform (MCP) was established to address challenges by providing a scalable ecosystem to support clinical research and AI development.<n>We conducted four research projects leveraging MCP's data infrastructure and analytical capabilities to demonstrate its potential in facilitating real-world evidence generation and AI-driven clinical insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T16:06:21Z)
• Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching [0.24554686192257422]
  Review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontology can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption.<n>Further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T11:45:50Z)
• From large language models to multimodal AI: A scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine [40.23383597339471]
  multimodal AI is capable of integrating diverse data modalities, including imaging, text, and structured data, within a single model.<n>This scoping review explores the evolution of multimodal AI, highlighting its methods, applications, datasets, and evaluation in clinical settings.<n>Our findings underscore a shift from unimodal to multimodal approaches, driving innovations in diagnostic support, medical report generation, drug discovery, and conversational AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T11:57:51Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice with Interactive Sequence [68.05876437208505]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow.<n>We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
  We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.<n>Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z)
• Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices [55.319842359034546]
  Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment. It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T11:13:52Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.