Lost in Aggregation: The Causal Interpretation of the IV Estimand

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12120v1
• Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 17:43:45 GMT
• Title: Lost in Aggregation: The Causal Interpretation of the IV Estimand
• Abstract summary: We show that the causal effect of an aggregate treatment is generally ambiguous, as it depends on how interventions on the aggregate are instantiated.<n>We then characterize conditions on the interventional distribution and the aggregate setting under which standard instrumental variable estimators identify the aggregate effect.
• Score: 5.51741499241756
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Instrumental variable based estimation of a causal effect has emerged as a standard approach to mitigate confounding bias in the social sciences and epidemiology, where conducting randomized experiments can be too costly or impossible. However, justifying the validity of the instrument often poses a significant challenge. In this work, we highlight a problem generally neglected in arguments for instrumental variable validity: the presence of an ''aggregate treatment variable'', where the treatment (e.g., education, GDP, caloric intake) is composed of finer-grained components that each may have a different effect on the outcome. We show that the causal effect of an aggregate treatment is generally ambiguous, as it depends on how interventions on the aggregate are instantiated at the component level, formalized through the aggregate-constrained component intervention distribution. We then characterize conditions on the interventional distribution and the aggregate setting under which standard instrumental variable estimators identify the aggregate effect. The contrived nature of these conditions implies major limitations on the interpretation of instrumental variable estimates based on aggregate treatments and highlights the need for a broader justificatory base for the exclusion restriction in such settings.

Related papers

• Causal Gaussian Processes for Robust Treatment Effect Evaluation with Unobserved Confounding [65.76392290956525]
  This paper investigates causal effect evaluation over the continuous domain from confounded observations.<n>We develop a novel family of Causal Gaussian process (CGP) models that effectively approximate the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with confounded observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T00:05:25Z)
• Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means [0.0]
  Interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean.<n>Mean-based causal estimands such as the average treatment effect may miss important structural effects.<n>We introduce topological-geometrical causal metrics based on summaries of interventional outcome laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T11:56:53Z)
• Causal Inference with Categorical Unobserved Confounder via Mixture Learning [20.542714966688656]
  We show that causal effects are identifiable when the unobserved confounder is categorical under suitable conditions.<n>We propose an estimation procedure based on tensor decomposition, which allows consistent recovery of the latent structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T18:28:16Z)
• Counterfactual Realizability [52.85109506684737]
  We introduce a formal definition of realizability, the ability to draw samples from a distribution, and then develop a complete algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary counterfactual distribution is realizable.<n>We illustrate the implications of this new framework for counterfactual data collection using motivating examples from causal fairness and causal reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T20:54:27Z)
• A Bayesian Classification Trees Approach to Treatment Effect Variation with Noncompliance [0.5356944479760104]
  Estimating varying treatment effects in randomized trials with noncompliance is inherently challenging. Existing flexible machine learning methods are highly sensitive to the weak instruments problem. We present a Bayesian Causal Forest model for binary response variables in scenarios with noncompliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T18:33:55Z)
• On the Identification of Temporally Causal Representation with Instantaneous Dependence [50.14432597910128]
  Temporally causal representation learning aims to identify the latent causal process from time series observations. Most methods require the assumption that the latent causal processes do not have instantaneous relations. We propose an textbfIDentification framework for instantanetextbfOus textbfLatent dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:08:05Z)
• Causal Inference from Text: Unveiling Interactions between Variables [20.677407402398405]
  Existing methods only account for confounding covariables that affect both treatment and outcome. This bias arises from insufficient consideration of non-confounding covariables. In this work, we aim to mitigate the bias by unveiling interactions between different variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:29:44Z)
• A Causal Framework for Decomposing Spurious Variations [68.12191782657437]
  We develop tools for decomposing spurious variations in Markovian and Semi-Markovian models. We prove the first results that allow a non-parametric decomposition of spurious effects. The described approach has several applications, ranging from explainable and fair AI to questions in epidemiology and medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:40:28Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Neighborhood Adaptive Estimators for Causal Inference under Network Interference [109.17155002599978]
  We consider the violation of the classical no-interference assumption with units connected by a network.<n>For tractability, we consider a known network that describes how interference may spread.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T14:53:47Z)
• Interpretable Deep Causal Learning for Moderation Effects [0.0]
  We address the problem of interpretability and targeted regularization in causal machine learning models. We propose a novel deep counterfactual learning architecture for estimating individual treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T11:21:09Z)
• On Testability of the Front-Door Model via Verma Constraints [7.52579126252489]
  Front-door criterion can be used to identify and compute causal effects despite unmeasured confounders. Key assumptions -- the existence of a variable that fully mediates the effect of the treatment on the outcome, and which simultaneously does not suffer from similar issues of confounding -- are often deemed implausible. We show that under mild conditions involving an auxiliary variable, the assumptions encoded in the front-door model may be tested via generalized equality constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T00:38:29Z)
• Long Story Short: Omitted Variable Bias in Causal Machine Learning [26.60315380737132]
  We develop a theory of omitted variable bias for a wide range of common causal parameters. We show how simple plausibility judgments on the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables are sufficient to bound the magnitude of the bias. We provide flexible and efficient statistical inference methods for the bounds, which can leverage modern machine learning algorithms for estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-26T15:38:23Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Deconfounded Score Method: Scoring DAGs with Dense Unobserved Confounding [101.35070661471124]
  We show that unobserved confounding leaves a characteristic footprint in the observed data distribution that allows for disentangling spurious and causal effects. We propose an adjusted score-based causal discovery algorithm that may be implemented with general-purpose solvers and scales to high-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:07:59Z)
• Valid Causal Inference with (Some) Invalid Instruments [24.794879633855373]
  We show how to perform consistent IV estimation despite violations of the exclusion assumption. We achieve accurate estimates of conditional average treatment effects using an ensemble of deep network-based estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T21:09:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.