Applying Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Decision Support in Mental
Health: What Have We Learned?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03511v1
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:40:51 GMT
- Title: Applying Artificial Intelligence to Clinical Decision Support in Mental
Health: What Have We Learned?
- Authors: Grace Golden, Christina Popescu, Sonia Israel, Kelly Perlman, Caitrin
Armstrong, Robert Fratila, Myriam Tanguay-Sela, and David Benrimoh
- Abstract summary: We present a case study of a recently developed AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of treatment in major depressive disorder.
We consider both the principles espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) augmented with artificial
intelligence (AI) models are emerging as potentially valuable tools in
healthcare. Despite their promise, the development and implementation of these
systems typically encounter several barriers, hindering the potential for
widespread adoption. Here we present a case study of a recently developed
AI-CDSS, Aifred Health, aimed at supporting the selection and management of
treatment in major depressive disorder. We consider both the principles
espoused during development and testing of this AI-CDSS, as well as the
practical solutions developed to facilitate implementation. We also propose
recommendations to consider throughout the building, validation, training, and
implementation process of an AI-CDSS. These recommendations include:
identifying the key problem, selecting the type of machine learning approach
based on this problem, determining the type of data required, determining the
format required for a CDSS to provide clinical utility, gathering physician and
patient feedback, and validating the tool across multiple settings. Finally, we
explore the potential benefits of widespread adoption of these systems, while
balancing these against implementation challenges such as ensuring systems do
not disrupt the clinical workflow, and designing systems in a manner that
engenders trust on the part of end users.
Related papers
- Artificial intelligence techniques in inherited retinal diseases: A review [19.107474958408847]
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a diverse group of genetic disorders that lead to progressive vision loss and are a major cause of blindness in working-age adults.
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising solutions to these challenges.
This review consolidates existing studies, identifies gaps, and provides an overview of AI's potential in diagnosing and managing IRDs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T03:14:51Z) - Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices [55.319842359034546]
Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices.
The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment.
It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T11:13:52Z) - Development of a Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support System for Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS)-Based Triage and Treatment Planning in Emergency Departments [0.0]
This study presents an LLM-driven CDSS to assist ED physicians and nurses in patient triage, treatment planning, and overall emergency care management.
The system comprises four AI agents emulating key ED roles: Triage Nurse, Emergency Physician, Pharmacist, and ED Coordinator.
It incorporates the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) for triage assessment and integrates with the RxNorm API for medication management.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T13:03:41Z) - A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods.
By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z) - TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design.
We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability.
We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z) - A Survey of Artificial Intelligence in Gait-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnosis [51.07114445705692]
neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) traditionally require extensive healthcare resources and human effort for medical diagnosis and monitoring.
As a crucial disease-related motor symptom, human gait can be exploited to characterize different NDs.
The current advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models enable automatic gait analysis for NDs identification and classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T06:44:40Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Neural machine translation of clinical procedure codes for medical diagnosis and uncertainty quantification [1.974814309194804]
We introduce the concept of Medical Entropy, quantifying uncertainties in patient outcomes predicted by neural machine translation based on the ICD-9 code of procedures.
Our experimental results show strong correlations between procedure and diagnosis sequences based on the simple ICD-9 code.
We also demonstrate the promising capacity to model trends of uncertainties during hospitalizations through a data-driven approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T20:11:56Z) - Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A
Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis [34.19436164837297]
We build SepsisLab based on a state-of-the-art AI algorithm and extend it to predict the future projection of sepsis development.
We demonstrate that SepsisLab enables a promising human-AI collaboration paradigm for the future of AI-assisted sepsis diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T19:19:39Z) - AutoPrognosis 2.0: Democratizing Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling in
Healthcare with Automated Machine Learning [72.2614468437919]
We present a machine learning framework, AutoPrognosis 2.0, to develop diagnostic and prognostic models.
We provide an illustrative application where we construct a prognostic risk score for diabetes using the UK Biobank.
Our risk score has been implemented as a web-based decision support tool and can be publicly accessed by patients and clinicians worldwide.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-21T16:31:46Z) - Moral Decision-Making in Medical Hybrid Intelligent Systems: A Team
Design Patterns Approach to the Bias Mitigation and Data Sharing Design
Problems [0.0]
Team Design Patterns (TDPs) describe successful and reusable configurations of design problems in which decisions have a moral component.
This thesis describes a set of solutions for two design problems in a medical HI system.
A survey was created to assess the usability of the patterns on their understandability, effectiveness, and generalizability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-16T17:09:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.