A Novel Evaluation Framework for Assessing Resilience Against Prompt Injection Attacks in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00991v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 02:06:48 GMT
• Title: A Novel Evaluation Framework for Assessing Resilience Against Prompt Injection Attacks in Large Language Models
• Authors: Daniel Wankit Yip, Aysan Esmradi, Chun Fai Chan,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a novel framework for quantifying the resilience of applications. The framework incorporates innovative techniques designed to ensure representativeness, interpretability, and robustness. Results revealed that Llama2, the newer model exhibited higher resilience compared to ChatGLM.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Prompt injection attacks exploit vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs) to manipulate the model into unintended actions or generate malicious content. As LLM integrated applications gain wider adoption, they face growing susceptibility to such attacks. This study introduces a novel evaluation framework for quantifying the resilience of applications. The framework incorporates innovative techniques designed to ensure representativeness, interpretability, and robustness. To ensure the representativeness of simulated attacks on the application, a meticulous selection process was employed, resulting in 115 carefully chosen attacks based on coverage and relevance. For enhanced interpretability, a second LLM was utilized to evaluate the responses generated from these simulated attacks. Unlike conventional malicious content classifiers that provide only a confidence score, the LLM-based evaluation produces a score accompanied by an explanation, thereby enhancing interpretability. Subsequently, a resilience score is computed by assigning higher weights to attacks with greater impact, thus providing a robust measurement of the application resilience. To assess the framework's efficacy, it was applied on two LLMs, namely Llama2 and ChatGLM. Results revealed that Llama2, the newer model exhibited higher resilience compared to ChatGLM. This finding substantiates the effectiveness of the framework, aligning with the prevailing notion that newer models tend to possess greater resilience. Moreover, the framework exhibited exceptional versatility, requiring only minimal adjustments to accommodate emerging attack techniques and classifications, thereby establishing itself as an effective and practical solution. Overall, the framework offers valuable insights that empower organizations to make well-informed decisions to fortify their applications against potential threats from prompt injection.

Related papers

• Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level [10.658844160259104]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense utility across various industries. As LLMs advance, the risk of harmful outputs increases due to incorrect or malicious instruction prompts. This paper examines the LLMs' capability to recognize harmful outputs, revealing and quantifying their proficiency in assessing the danger of previous tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T12:09:30Z)
• Counterfactual Explainable Incremental Prompt Attack Analysis on Large Language Models [32.03992137755351]
  This study sheds light on the imperative need to bolster safety and privacy measures in large language models (LLMs) We propose Counterfactual Explainable Incremental Prompt Attack (CEIPA), a novel technique where we guide prompts in a specific manner to quantitatively measure attack effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T14:26:14Z)
• Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem [80.52431374743998]
  We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process. We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness. We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T15:12:27Z)
• MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
  We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models. Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs. Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z)
• Raccoon: Prompt Extraction Benchmark of LLM-Integrated Applications [8.51254190797079]
  We introduce the Raccoon benchmark which comprehensively evaluates a model's susceptibility to prompt extraction attacks. Our novel evaluation method assesses models under both defenseless and defended scenarios. Our findings highlight universal susceptibility to prompt theft in the absence of defenses, with OpenAI models demonstrating notable resilience when protected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T18:57:22Z)
• Defending Large Language Models Against Attacks With Residual Stream Activation Analysis [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial threats. This paper presents an innovative defensive strategy, given white box access to an LLM. We apply a novel methodology for analyzing distinctive activation patterns in the residual streams for attack prompt classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:06:33Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
  Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z)
• Data Poisoning for In-context Learning [49.77204165250528]
  In-context learning (ICL) has been recognized for its innovative ability to adapt to new tasks. This paper delves into the critical issue of ICL's susceptibility to data poisoning attacks. We introduce ICLPoison, a specialized attacking framework conceived to exploit the learning mechanisms of ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T14:20:20Z)
• A Generative Framework for Low-Cost Result Validation of Machine Learning-as-a-Service Inference [4.478182379059458]
  Fides is a novel framework for real-time integrity validation of ML-as-a-Service (ML) inference. Fides features a client-side attack detection model that uses statistical analysis and divergence measurements to identify, with a high likelihood, if the service model is under attack. We devised a generative adversarial network framework for training the attack detection and re-classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T19:17:30Z)
• Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness [53.094682754683255]
  We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack (MAMA) approach to discover stronger attack algorithms automatically. Our method learns the in adversarial attacks parameterized by a recurrent neural network. We develop a model-agnostic training algorithm to improve the ability of the learned when attacking unseen defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T13:54:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.