Innate-Values-driven Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05572v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:51:10 GMT
• Title: Innate-Values-driven Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems
• Authors: Qin Yang
• Abstract summary: Innate values describe agents' intrinsic motivations, which reflect their inherent interests and preferences to pursue goals. The essence of reinforcement learning (RL) is learning from interaction based on reward-driven (such as utilities) behaviors. This paper proposes a hierarchical compound value reinforcement learning model -- intrinsic-driven reinforcement learning -- to describe the complex behaviors of multi-agent interaction.
• Score: 1.8220718426493654
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Innate values describe agents' intrinsic motivations, which reflect their inherent interests and preferences to pursue goals and drive them to develop diverse skills satisfying their various needs. The essence of reinforcement learning (RL) is learning from interaction based on reward-driven (such as utilities) behaviors, much like natural agents. It is an excellent model to describe the innate-values-driven (IV) behaviors of AI agents. Especially in multi-agent systems (MAS), building the awareness of AI agents to balance the group utilities and system costs and satisfy group members' needs in their cooperation is a crucial problem for individuals learning to support their community and integrate human society in the long term. This paper proposes a hierarchical compound intrinsic value reinforcement learning model -- innate-values-driven reinforcement learning termed IVRL to describe the complex behaviors of multi-agent interaction in their cooperation. We implement the IVRL architecture in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC) environment and compare the cooperative performance within three characteristics of innate value agents (Coward, Neutral, and Reckless) through three benchmark multi-agent RL algorithms: QMIX, IQL, and QTRAN. The results demonstrate that by organizing individual various needs rationally, the group can achieve better performance with lower costs effectively.

Related papers

• Rationality based Innate-Values-driven Reinforcement Learning [1.8220718426493654]
  Innate values describe agents' intrinsic motivations, which reflect their inherent interests and preferences to pursue goals. It is an excellent model to describe the innate-values-driven (IV) behaviors of AI agents. This paper proposes a hierarchical reinforcement learning model -- innate-values-driven reinforcement learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T03:28:02Z)
• Enhancing Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Cooperation in Decentralized MARL via GNN-driven Intrinsic Rewards [1.179778723980276]
  Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is emerging as a key framework for sequential decision-making and control tasks. The deployment of these systems in real-world scenarios often requires decentralized training, a diverse set of agents, and learning from infrequent environmental reward signals. We propose the CoHet algorithm, which utilizes a novel Graph Neural Network (GNN) based intrinsic motivation to facilitate the learning of heterogeneous agent policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T21:38:40Z)
• DCIR: Dynamic Consistency Intrinsic Reward for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [84.22561239481901]
  We propose a new approach that enables agents to learn whether their behaviors should be consistent with that of other agents. We evaluate DCIR in multiple environments including Multi-agent Particle, Google Research Football and StarCraft II Micromanagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T06:03:57Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• Learning in Cooperative Multiagent Systems Using Cognitive and Machine Models [1.0742675209112622]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are critical for many applications requiring collaboration and coordination with humans. One major challenge is the simultaneous learning and interaction of independent agents in dynamic environments. We propose three variants of Multi-Agent IBL models (MAIBL) We demonstrate that the MAIBL models exhibit faster learning and achieve better coordination in a dynamic CMOTP task with various settings of rewards compared to current MADRL models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T00:39:06Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [122.47938710284784]
  We propose a novel framework for learning dynamic subtask assignment (LDSA) in cooperative MARL. To reasonably assign agents to different subtasks, we propose an ability-based subtask selection strategy. We show that LDSA learns reasonable and effective subtask assignment for better collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T10:46:16Z)
• Modeling Bounded Rationality in Multi-Agent Simulations Using Rationally Inattentive Reinforcement Learning [85.86440477005523]
  We study more human-like RL agents which incorporate an established model of human-irrationality, the Rational Inattention (RI) model. RIRL models the cost of cognitive information processing using mutual information. We show that using RIRL yields a rich spectrum of new equilibrium behaviors that differ from those found under rational assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T20:54:00Z)
• Reward Machines for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [30.84689303706561]
  In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, a collection of agents learns to interact in a shared environment to achieve a common goal. We propose the use of reward machines (RM) -- Mealy machines used as structured representations of reward functions -- to encode the team's task. The proposed novel interpretation of RMs in the multi-agent setting explicitly encodes required teammate interdependencies, allowing the team-level task to be decomposed into sub-tasks for individual agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T23:08:14Z)
• Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents [73.03133692589532]
  We show how to equip RL agents with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:12:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.