Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge at Different Layers?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07066v2
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:53:56 GMT
- Title: Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge at Different Layers?
- Authors: Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Jingyuan Huang, Qingcheng Zeng, Zhenting Wang, Wenyue Hua, Haiyan Zhao, Kai Mei, Yanda Meng, Kaize Ding, Fan Yang, Mengnan Du, Yongfeng Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks.
However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood.
We introduce the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers.
- Score: 57.04803703952721
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks. However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that LLMs process concepts of varying complexities in different layers, introducing the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers. Specifically, we categorize concepts based on their level of abstraction, defining them in the order of increasing complexity within factual, emotional, and inferential tasks. We conduct extensive probing experiments using layer-wise representations across various LLM families (Gemma, LLaMA, QWen) on various datasets spanning the three domains of tasks. Our findings reveal that models could efficiently conduct probing for simpler tasks in shallow layers, and more complex tasks typically necessitate deeper layers for accurate understanding. Additionally, we examine how external factors, such as adding noise to the input and quantizing the model weights, might affect layer-wise representations. Our findings suggest that these factors can impede the development of a conceptual understanding of LLMs until deeper layers are explored. We hope that our proposed concept and experimental insights will enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying LLMs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Luckfort/CD.
Related papers
- Looking into Black Box Code Language Models [2.5324062203985935]
We use two state-of-the-art codeLMs, Codegen-Mono and Ploycoder, and three widely used programming languages, Java, Go, and Python.
We show concepts of interest can be edited within feed-forward layers without compromising codeLM performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T21:13:41Z) - Investigating How Large Language Models Leverage Internal Knowledge to Perform Complex Reasoning [30.349165483935682]
We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge.
Our analysis shows that smaller models have more discrepancies than larger models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T19:29:36Z) - Can Large Language Models Understand DL-Lite Ontologies? An Empirical Study [10.051572826948762]
Large models (LLMs) have shown significant achievements in solving a wide range of tasks.
We empirically analyze the LLMs' capability of understanding Description Logic (DL-Lite)
We find that LLMs understand formal syntax and model-theoretic semantics of concepts and roles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T13:16:34Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks.
The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human.
These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z) - Is Bigger and Deeper Always Better? Probing LLaMA Across Scales and
Layers [73.28459749681879]
This paper focuses on LLaMA, a prominent open-source foundational model in natural language processing.
Instead of assessing LLaMA through its generative output, we design multiple-choice tasks to probe its intrinsic understanding.
We unveil several key and uncommon findings based on the designed probing tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T14:50:41Z) - Characterizing Large Language Model Geometry Helps Solve Toxicity Detection and Generation [15.77263269398368]
Large Language Models (LLMs) drive current AI breakthroughs.
We shed the light on LLMs inner mechanisms through the lens of geometry.
We derive interpretable geometrical features that can be extracted from any (pre-trained) LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T06:01:32Z) - Large Model Based Referring Camouflaged Object Detection [51.80619142347807]
Referring camouflaged object detection (Ref-COD) is a recently-proposed problem aiming to segment out specified camouflaged objects matched with a textual or visual reference.
Our motivation is to make full use of the semantic intelligence and intrinsic knowledge of recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to decompose this complex task in a human-like way.
We propose a large-model-based Multi-Level Knowledge-Guided multimodal method for Ref-COD termed MLKG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T13:45:09Z) - Understanding Masked Autoencoders via Hierarchical Latent Variable
Models [109.35382136147349]
Masked autoencoder (MAE) has recently achieved prominent success in a variety of vision tasks.
Despite the emergence of intriguing empirical observations on MAE, a theoretically principled understanding is still lacking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T03:00:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.