Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16369v3
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 07:27:32 GMT
• Title: Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal
• Authors: Yukai Zhou, Jian Lou, Zhijie Huang, Zhan Qin, Yibei Yang, Wenjie Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce DSN (Don't Say No) attack, which combines a cosine decay schedule method with refusal suppression to achieve higher success rates.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that DSN outperforms baseline attacks and achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates (ASR)
• Score: 15.350198454170895
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring the safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical for generating responses consistent with human values. However, LLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where carefully crafted prompts manipulate them into producing toxic content. One category of such attacks reformulates the task as an optimization problem, aiming to elicit affirmative responses from the LLM. However, these methods heavily rely on predefined objectionable behaviors, limiting their effectiveness and adaptability to diverse harmful queries. In this study, we first identify why the vanilla target loss is suboptimal and then propose enhancements to the loss objective. We introduce DSN (Don't Say No) attack, which combines a cosine decay schedule method with refusal suppression to achieve higher success rates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DSN outperforms baseline attacks and achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates (ASR). DSN also shows strong universality and transferability to unseen datasets and black-box models.

Related papers

• Strategic Deflection: Defending LLMs from Logit Manipulation [0.3903025330856988]
  We introduce Strategic Deflection (SDeflection), a defense that redefines the Large Language Models' response to such advanced attacks.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that SDeflection significantly lowers Attack Success Rate (ASR) while maintaining model performance on benign queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T18:46:56Z)
• Wolf Hidden in Sheep's Conversations: Toward Harmless Data-Based Backdoor Attacks for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [69.11679786018206]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) aligns large language models with human intent by training them on labeled task-specific data.<n>Recent studies have shown that malicious attackers can inject backdoors into these models by embedding triggers into the harmful question-answer pairs.<n>We propose a novel clean-data backdoor attack for jailbreaking LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z)
• Cannot See the Forest for the Trees: Invoking Heuristics and Biases to Elicit Irrational Choices of LLMs [83.11815479874447]
  We propose a novel jailbreak attack framework, inspired by cognitive decomposition and biases in human cognition.<n>We employ cognitive decomposition to reduce the complexity of malicious prompts and relevance bias to reorganize prompts.<n>We also introduce a ranking-based harmfulness evaluation metric that surpasses the traditional binary success-or-failure paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T05:28:11Z)
• Sugar-Coated Poison: Benign Generation Unlocks LLM Jailbreaking [15.953888359667497]
  jailbreak attacks based on prompt engineering have become a major safety threat.<n>This study introduces the concept of Defense Threshold Decay (DTD), revealing the potential safety impact caused by LLMs' benign generation.<n>We propose the Sugar-Coated Poison attack paradigm, which uses a "semantic reversal" strategy to craft benign inputs that are opposite in meaning to malicious intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T03:57:09Z)
• Align in Depth: Defending Jailbreak Attacks via Progressive Answer Detoxification [17.500701903902094]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which use crafted prompts to elicit toxic responses.<n>This paper proposes DEEPALIGN, a robust defense framework that fine-tunes LLMs to progressively detoxify generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T08:32:12Z)
• Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimization [65.41451412400609]
  Existing training-time safety alignment techniques for large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. We propose an improved safety alignment that disentangles DPO objectives into two components: (1) robust refusal training, which encourages refusal even when partial unsafe generations are produced, and (2) targeted unlearning of harmful knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T18:01:05Z)
• REINFORCE Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models: An Adaptive, Distributional, and Semantic Objective [57.57786477441956]
  We propose an adaptive and semantic optimization problem over the population of responses. Our objective doubles the attack success rate (ASR) on Llama3 and increases the ASR from 2% to 50% with circuit breaker defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:34:48Z)
• Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models [53.580928907886324]
  Reasoning-Augmented Conversation is a novel multi-turn jailbreak framework. It reformulates harmful queries into benign reasoning tasks. We show that RACE achieves state-of-the-art attack effectiveness in complex conversational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T09:27:44Z)
• Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks [12.446931518819875]
  Jailbreaking attacks can effectively manipulate open-source large language models (LLMs) to produce harmful responses. This work investigates the transferability of jailbreaking attacks by analysing their impact on the model's intent perception. We propose the Perceived-importance Flatten (PiF) method, which uniformly disperses the model's focus across neutral-intent tokens in the original input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T10:29:54Z)
• Semantic Loss Guided Data Efficient Supervised Fine Tuning for Safe Responses in LLMs [18.044879441434432]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generating unsafe responses to toxic prompts is a significant issue in their applications.<n>In this paper, we aim to take this problem and overcome limitations of requiring significant high-quality human data.<n>By employing a semantic cost combined with a negative Earth Mover Distance (EMD) loss, we guide the LLM away from generating unsafe responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T16:35:14Z)
• The VLLM Safety Paradox: Dual Ease in Jailbreak Attack and Defense [56.32083100401117]
  We investigate why Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) are prone to jailbreak attacks. We then make a key observation: existing defense mechanisms suffer from an textbfover-prudence problem. We find that the two representative evaluation methods for jailbreak often exhibit chance agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T07:57:19Z)
• A Realistic Threat Model for Large Language Model Jailbreaks [87.64278063236847]
  In this work, we propose a unified threat model for the principled comparison of jailbreak attacks. Our threat model combines constraints in perplexity, measuring how far a jailbreak deviates from natural text. We adapt popular attacks to this new, realistic threat model, with which we, for the first time, benchmark these attacks on equal footing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:27:01Z)
• Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level [10.658844160259104]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense utility across various industries. As LLMs advance, the risk of harmful outputs increases due to incorrect or malicious instruction prompts. This paper examines the LLMs' capability to recognize harmful outputs, revealing and quantifying their proficiency in assessing the danger of previous tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T12:09:30Z)
• Detecting AI Flaws: Target-Driven Attacks on Internal Faults in Language Models [27.397408870544453]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. A critical concern is the presence of toxic content within the pre-training corpus of these models, which can lead to the generation of inappropriate outputs. This paper proposes a target-driven attack paradigm that focuses on directly eliciting the target response instead of optimizing the prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T08:12:08Z)
• Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [23.782566331783134]
  We focus on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. We explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T01:58:03Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position.<n>DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful response sequence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem [80.52431374743998]
  We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process.<n>We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness.<n>We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T15:12:27Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models. It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Gradient Cuff: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models by Exploring Refusal Loss Landscapes [61.916827858666906]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a prominent generative AI tool, where the user enters a query and the LLM generates an answer. To reduce harm and misuse, efforts have been made to align these LLMs to human values using advanced training techniques such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. Recent studies have highlighted the vulnerability of LLMs to adversarial jailbreak attempts aiming at subverting the embedded safety guardrails. This paper proposes a method called Gradient Cuff to detect jailbreak attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:29:54Z)
• ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings [58.82536530615557]
  We propose an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF) to transform continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text. Our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T06:46:27Z)
• Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessment [8.948475969696075]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful zero-shot assessors used in real-world situations such as assessing written exams and benchmarking systems. We show that short universal adversarial phrases can be deceived to judge LLMs to predict inflated scores. It is found that judge-LLMs are significantly more susceptible to these adversarial attacks when used for absolute scoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T18:55:20Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [82.98081731588717]
  Integration of large language models with external content exposes applications to indirect prompt injection attacks. We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to evaluate the risk of such attacks. We develop two black-box methods based on prompt learning and a white-box defense method based on fine-tuning with adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks [99.23352758320945]
  We propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks on large language models (LLMs) Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense first randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.