Smurfs: Leveraging Multiple Proficiency Agents with Context-Efficiency for Tool Planning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05955v3
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 02:44:57 GMT
- Title: Smurfs: Leveraging Multiple Proficiency Agents with Context-Efficiency for Tool Planning
- Authors: Junzhi Chen, Juhao Liang, Benyou Wang,
- Abstract summary: Smurfs' is a cutting-edge multi-agent framework designed to revolutionize the application of large language models.
Smurfs can enhance the model's ability to solve complex tasks at no additional cost.
- Score: 14.635361844362794
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has opened up unprecedented possibilities for automating complex tasks that are often comparable to human performance. Despite their capabilities, LLMs still encounter difficulties in completing tasks that require high levels of accuracy and complexity due to their inherent limitations in handling multifaceted problems single-handedly. This paper introduces `Smurfs', a cutting-edge multi-agent framework designed to revolutionize the application of LLMs. By seamlessly transforming a conventional LLM into a synergistic multi-agent ensemble, Smurfs can enhance the model's ability to solve complex tasks at no additional cost. This is achieved through innovative prompting strategies that allocate distinct roles within the model, thereby facilitating collaboration among specialized agents and forming an intelligent multi-agent system. Our empirical investigation on both open-ended task of StableToolBench and closed-ended task on HotpotQA showcases Smurfs' superior capability in intricate tool utilization scenarios. Notably, Smurfs outmatches all the baseline methods in both experiments, setting new state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, through comprehensive ablation studies, we dissect the contribution of the core components of the multi-agent framework to its overall efficacy. This not only verifies the effectiveness of the framework, but also sets a route for future exploration of multi-agent LLM systems.
Related papers
- Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework.
At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence.
We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z) - Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability [12.349247962800813]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many AI problems.
They exhibit remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities.
How they approach composite tasks remains an open and largely underexplored question.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T15:22:34Z) - Sibyl: Simple yet Effective Agent Framework for Complex Real-world Reasoning [12.80689911863731]
Sibyl is a powerful framework designed to tackle complex reasoning tasks by efficiently leveraging a minimal set of tools.
Sibyl implements a multi-agent debate-based jury to self-refine the final answers, ensuring a comprehensive and balanced approach.
Our experimental results on the GAIA benchmark test set reveal that the Sibyl agent achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average score of 34.55%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T13:45:40Z) - Adaptive In-conversation Team Building for Language Model Agents [33.03550687362213]
Leveraging multiple large language model (LLM) agents has shown to be a promising approach for tackling complex tasks.
Our new adaptive team-building paradigm offers a flexible solution, realized through a novel agent design named Captain Agent.
A comprehensive evaluation across six real-world scenarios demonstrates that Captain Agent significantly outperforms existing multi-agent methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T18:08:37Z) - Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities.
When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z) - Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs.
We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer.
This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z) - TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation.
Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed.
Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z) - Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving.
We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time.
Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z) - Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration [83.4031923134958]
Corex is a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform Large Language Models into autonomous agents.
Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes.
We demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T07:11:39Z) - AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks.
We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.