Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14393v4
• Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:56:50 GMT
• Title: Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem
• Authors: Zhihui Xie, Jiahui Gao, Lei Li, Zhenguo Li, Qi Liu, Lingpeng Kong,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process. We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness. We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
• Score: 80.52431374743998
• License:
• Abstract: The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about their safety and reliability, particularly regarding their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process. This misspecification occurs when the reward function fails to accurately capture the intended behavior, leading to misaligned model outputs. We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness and robustness in detecting harmful backdoor prompts. Building upon these insights, we present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space. ReMiss achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates on the AdvBench benchmark against various target aligned LLMs while preserving the human readability of the generated prompts. Furthermore, these attacks on open-source models demonstrate high transferability to closed-source models like GPT-4o and out-of-distribution tasks from HarmBench. Detailed analysis highlights the unique advantages of the proposed reward misspecification objective compared to previous methods, offering new insights for improving LLM safety and robustness.

Related papers

• Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks [12.446931518819875]
  Jailbreaking attacks can effectively manipulate open-source large language models (LLMs) to produce harmful responses. This work investigates the transferability of jailbreaking attacks by analysing their impact on the model's intent perception. We propose the Perceived-importance Flatten (PiF) method, which uniformly disperses the model's focus across neutral-intent tokens in the original input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T10:29:54Z)
• Enhancing AI Safety Through the Fusion of Low Rank Adapters [7.384556630042846]
  Low-Rank Adapter Fusion mitigates harmful responses when faced with malicious prompts. We show a 42% reduction in the harmfulness rate by leveraging LoRA fusion between a task adapter and a safety adapter. We also observe exaggerated safety behaviour, where the model rejects safe prompts that closely resemble unsafe ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T13:12:27Z)
• Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level [10.476222570886483]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense utility across various industries. As LLMs advance, the risk of harmful outputs increases due to incorrect or malicious instruction prompts. This paper examines the LLMs' capability to recognize harmful outputs, revealing and quantifying their proficiency in assessing the danger of previous tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T12:09:30Z)
• CALoR: Towards Comprehensive Model Inversion Defense [43.2642796582236]
  Model Inversion Attacks (MIAs) aim at recovering privacy-sensitive training data from the knowledge encoded in released machine learning models. Recent advances in the MIA field have significantly enhanced the attack performance under multiple scenarios. We propose a robust defense mechanism, integrating Confidence Adaptation and Low-Rank compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T08:44:01Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Uncertainty is Fragile: Manipulating Uncertainty in Large Language Models [79.76293901420146]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are employed across various high-stakes domains, where the reliability of their outputs is crucial. Our research investigates the fragility of uncertainty estimation and explores potential attacks. We demonstrate that an attacker can embed a backdoor in LLMs, which, when activated by a specific trigger in the input, manipulates the model's uncertainty without affecting the final output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T23:41:11Z)
• Raccoon: Prompt Extraction Benchmark of LLM-Integrated Applications [8.51254190797079]
  We introduce the Raccoon benchmark which comprehensively evaluates a model's susceptibility to prompt extraction attacks. Our novel evaluation method assesses models under both defenseless and defended scenarios. Our findings highlight universal susceptibility to prompt theft in the absence of defenses, with OpenAI models demonstrating notable resilience when protected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T18:57:22Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities. Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content. We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Unveiling Vulnerabilities of Contrastive Recommender Systems to Poisoning Attacks [48.911832772464145]
  Contrastive learning (CL) has recently gained prominence in the domain of recommender systems. This paper identifies a vulnerability of CL-based recommender systems that they are more susceptible to poisoning attacks aiming to promote individual items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T04:25:28Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.