Causal modelling without counterfactuals and individualised effects
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17385v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:07:57 GMT
- Title: Causal modelling without counterfactuals and individualised effects
- Authors: Benedikt Höltgen, Robert C. Williamson,
- Abstract summary: In this paper, we construe causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable.
The new framework highlights the model-dependence of causal claims as well as the difference between statistical and scientific inference.
- Score: 7.09435109588801
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The most common approach to causal modelling is the potential outcomes framework due to Neyman and Rubin. In this framework, outcomes of counterfactual treatments are assumed to be well-defined. This metaphysical assumption is often thought to be problematic yet indispensable. The conventional approach relies not only on counterfactuals, but also on abstract notions of distributions and assumptions of independence that are not directly testable. In this paper, we construe causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable; this means that one can not only test predictions themselves (without any fundamental problem), but also investigate sources of error when they fail. The new framework highlights the model-dependence of causal claims as well as the difference between statistical and scientific inference.
Related papers
- Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data.
We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations.
We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z) - Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified
Causal Effects [2.1638817206926855]
Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes.
We propose a unified and model-agnostic inferential approach for a wide class of partially identified estimands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T08:17:30Z) - A Bias-Variance-Covariance Decomposition of Kernel Scores for Generative Models [13.527864898609398]
We introduce the first bias-variance-covariance decomposition for kernel scores.
We derive a kernel-based variance and entropy for uncertainty estimation.
Based on the wide applicability of kernels, we demonstrate our framework via generalization and uncertainty experiments for image, audio, and language generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T16:22:11Z) - Self-Compatibility: Evaluating Causal Discovery without Ground Truth [28.72650348646176]
We propose a novel method for falsifying the output of a causal discovery algorithm in the absence of ground truth.
Our key insight is that while statistical learning seeks stability across subsets of data points, causal learning should seek stability across subsets of variables.
We prove that detecting incompatibilities can falsify wrongly inferred causal relations due to violation of assumptions or errors from finite sample effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-18T18:59:42Z) - Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals For Invertible Latent Causal Models [15.817239008727789]
In this work, we analyze a specific type of causal query called domain counterfactuals, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain.
We show that recovering the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM) is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals.
We also develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T04:19:06Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian
Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models.
One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z) - Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell
inequality violations via statistical model selection [0.0]
Bell inequalities follow from a set of seemingly natural assumptions about how to provide a causal model of a Bell experiment.
Two types of causal models that modify some of these assumptions have been proposed.
We seek to adjudicate between these alternatives based on their predictive power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-30T19:33:02Z) - Disentangling Observed Causal Effects from Latent Confounders using
Method of Moments [67.27068846108047]
We provide guarantees on identifiability and learnability under mild assumptions.
We develop efficient algorithms based on coupled tensor decomposition with linear constraints to obtain scalable and guaranteed solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T07:48:45Z) - Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs.
We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables.
We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.