The Role of Explainable AI in Revolutionizing Human Health Monitoring: A Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07347v3
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:13:35 GMT
- Title: The Role of Explainable AI in Revolutionizing Human Health Monitoring: A Review
- Authors: Abdullah Alharthi, Ahmed Alqurashi, Turki Alharbi, Mohammed Alammar, Nasser Aldosari, Houssem Bouchekara, Yusuf Shaaban, Mohammad Shoaib Shahriar, Abdulrahman Al Ayidh,
- Abstract summary: Review aims to highlight the role of Explainable AI (XAI) in addressing the interpretability issues of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare.<n>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies that applied XAI techniques in healthcare.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: The complex nature of disease mechanisms and the variability of patient symptoms pose significant challenges in developing effective diagnostic tools. Although machine learning (ML) has made substantial advances in medical diagnosis, the decision-making processes of these models often lack transparency, potentially jeopardizing patient outcomes. This review aims to highlight the role of Explainable AI (XAI) in addressing the interpretability issues of ML models in healthcare, with a focus on chronic conditions such as Parkinson's, stroke, depression, cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer's disease. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies that applied XAI techniques in healthcare. The search focused on XAI algorithms used in diagnosing and monitoring chronic diseases. The review identified the application of nine trending XAI algorithms, each evaluated for their advantages and limitations in various healthcare contexts. The findings underscore the importance of transparency in ML models, which is crucial for improving trust and outcomes in clinical practice. While XAI provides significant potential to bridge the gap between complex ML models and clinical practice, challenges such as scalability, validation, and clinician acceptance remain. The review also highlights areas requiring further research, particularly in integrating XAI into healthcare systems. The study concludes that XAI methods offer a promising path forward for enhancing human health monitoring and patient care, though significant challenges must be addressed to fully realize their potential in clinical settings.
Related papers
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Emergency Medicine: A Review of Recent Advances [0.2544903230401084]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing emergency medicine by enhancing diagnostic processes and improving patient outcomes.
Machine learning and deep learning are pivotal in interpreting complex imaging data, offering rapid, accurate diagnoses and potentially surpassing traditional diagnostic methods.
Despite these advancements, the integration of AI into clinical practice presents challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for extensive validation across diverse settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T17:45:00Z) - Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [61.633126163190724]
Mental illness is a widespread and debilitating condition with substantial societal and personal costs.
Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold great potential for recognizing and addressing conditions such as depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Privacy concerns, including the risk of sensitive data leakage from datasets and trained models, remain a critical barrier to deploying these AI systems in real-world clinical settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z) - Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.
Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z) - MAGDA: Multi-agent guideline-driven diagnostic assistance [43.15066219293877]
In emergency departments, rural hospitals, or clinics in less developed regions, clinicians often lack fast image analysis by trained radiologists.
In this work, we introduce a new approach for zero-shot guideline-driven decision support.
We model a system of multiple LLM agents augmented with a contrastive vision-language model that collaborate to reach a patient diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T09:10:30Z) - Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques [38.321248253111776]
Article explores the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
Aims to highlight the potential of XAI in bridging the gap between complex AI models and practical healthcare applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T18:50:03Z) - A Survey of Artificial Intelligence in Gait-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnosis [51.07114445705692]
neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) traditionally require extensive healthcare resources and human effort for medical diagnosis and monitoring.
As a crucial disease-related motor symptom, human gait can be exploited to characterize different NDs.
The current advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models enable automatic gait analysis for NDs identification and classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T06:44:40Z) - Emotional Intelligence Through Artificial Intelligence : NLP and Deep Learning in the Analysis of Healthcare Texts [1.9374282535132377]
This manuscript presents a methodical examination of the utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the assessment of emotions in texts related to healthcare.
We scrutinize numerous research studies that employ AI to augment sentiment analysis, categorize emotions, and forecast patient outcomes.
There persist challenges, which encompass ensuring the ethical application of AI, safeguarding patient confidentiality, and addressing potential biases in algorithmic procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T15:58:13Z) - Optimizing Skin Lesion Classification via Multimodal Data and Auxiliary
Task Integration [54.76511683427566]
This research introduces a novel multimodal method for classifying skin lesions, integrating smartphone-captured images with essential clinical and demographic information.
A distinctive aspect of this method is the integration of an auxiliary task focused on super-resolution image prediction.
The experimental evaluations have been conducted using the PAD-UFES20 dataset, applying various deep-learning architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T05:16:20Z) - Enabling Collaborative Clinical Diagnosis of Infectious Keratitis by
Integrating Expert Knowledge and Interpretable Data-driven Intelligence [28.144658552047975]
This study investigates the performance, interpretability, and clinical utility of knowledge-guided diagnosis model (KGDM) in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis (IK)
The diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) of the interpreted AI-based biomarkers are effective, ranging from 3.011 to 35.233.
The participants with collaboration achieved a performance exceeding that of both humans and AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-14T02:10:54Z) - The Significance of Machine Learning in Clinical Disease Diagnosis: A
Review [0.0]
This research investigates the capacity of machine learning algorithms to improve the transmission of heart rate data in time series healthcare metrics.
The factors under consideration include the algorithm utilized, the types of diseases targeted, the data types employed, the applications, and the evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T20:28:22Z) - Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A
Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis [34.19436164837297]
We build SepsisLab based on a state-of-the-art AI algorithm and extend it to predict the future projection of sepsis development.
We demonstrate that SepsisLab enables a promising human-AI collaboration paradigm for the future of AI-assisted sepsis diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T19:19:39Z) - Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
"Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions.
We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z) - XAI Renaissance: Redefining Interpretability in Medical Diagnostic
Models [0.0]
The XAI Renaissance aims to redefine the interpretability of medical diagnostic models.
XAI techniques empower healthcare professionals to understand, trust, and effectively utilize these models for accurate and reliable medical diagnoses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T16:42:20Z) - A Brief Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare [7.844015105790313]
XAI refers to the techniques and methods for building AI applications.
Model explainability and interpretability are vital successful deployment of AI models in healthcare practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T05:41:57Z) - Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities.
One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data.
Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z) - Achievements and Challenges in Explaining Deep Learning based
Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems [4.9449660544238085]
We discuss early achievements in development of explainable AI for validation of known disease criteria.
We highlight some of the remaining challenges that stand in the way of practical applications of AI as a clinical decision support tool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-26T08:08:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.