VIEWER: an extensible visual analytics framework for enhancing mental healthcare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07247v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:01:13 GMT
• Title: VIEWER: an extensible visual analytics framework for enhancing mental healthcare
• Authors: Tao Wang, David Codling, Yamiko Msosa, Matthew Broadbent, Daisy Kornblum, Catherine Polling, Thomas Searle, Claire Delaney-Pope, Barbara Arroyo, Stuart MacLellan, Zoe Keddie, Mary Docherty, Angus Roberts, Robert Stewart, Richard Dobson, Robert Harland,
• Abstract summary: VIEWER is an open-source toolkit that employs distributed natural language processing and interactive visualisation techniques. VIEWER was developed to improve data accessibility and representation across various aspects of healthcare delivery.
• Score: 2.52780220954141
• License:
• Abstract: Objective: To design and implement VIEWER, a versatile toolkit for visual analytics of clinical data, and to systematically evaluate its effectiveness across various clinical applications while gathering feedback for iterative improvements. Materials and Methods: VIEWER is an open-source and extensible toolkit that employs distributed natural language processing and interactive visualisation techniques to facilitate the rapid design, development, and deployment of clinical information retrieval, analysis, and visualisation at the point of care. Through an iterative and collaborative participatory design approach, VIEWER was designed and implemented in a large mental health institution, where its clinical utility and effectiveness were assessed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Results: VIEWER provides interactive, problem-focused, and comprehensive views of longitudinal patient data from a combination of structured clinical data and unstructured clinical notes. Despite a relatively short adoption period and users' initial unfamiliarity, VIEWER significantly improved performance and task completion speed compared to the standard clinical information system. Users and stakeholders reported high satisfaction and expressed strong interest in incorporating VIEWER into their daily practice. Discussion: VIEWER provides a cost-effective enhancement to the functionalities of standard clinical information systems, with evaluation offering valuable feedback for future improvements. Conclusion: VIEWER was developed to improve data accessibility and representation across various aspects of healthcare delivery, including population health management and patient monitoring. The deployment of VIEWER highlights the benefits of collaborative refinement in optimizing health informatics solutions for enhanced patient care.

Related papers

• A Hybrid Data-Driven Approach For Analyzing And Predicting Inpatient Length Of Stay In Health Centre [0.0]
  The study proposes an all-encompassing framework for the optimization of patient flow. Using a comprehensive dataset of 2.3 million de-identified patient records, we analyzed demographics, diagnoses, treatments, services, costs, and charges. Our model predicts patient length of stay (LoS) upon admission using supervised learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:01:48Z)
• Advancing clinical trial outcomes using deep learning and predictive modelling: bridging precision medicine and patient-centered care [0.0]
  Deep learning and predictive modelling have emerged as transformative tools for optimizing clinical trial design, patient recruitment, and real-time monitoring. This study explores the application of deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks [CNNs] and transformerbased models, to stratify patients. Predictive modelling approaches, including survival analysis and time-series forecasting, are employed to predict trial outcomes, enhancing efficiency and reducing trial failure rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T23:20:08Z)
• Named Clinical Entity Recognition Benchmark [2.9332007863461893]
  This report introduces a Named Clinical Entity Recognition Benchmark. It addresses the crucial natural language processing (NLP) task of extracting structured information from clinical narratives. The leaderboard provides a standardized platform for assessing diverse language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T14:00:18Z)
• STLLaVA-Med: Self-Training Large Language and Vision Assistant for Medical Question-Answering [58.79671189792399]
  STLLaVA-Med is designed to train a policy model capable of auto-generating medical visual instruction data. We validate the efficacy and data efficiency of STLLaVA-Med across three major medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T15:01:23Z)
• Patient-Centric Knowledge Graphs: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Applications [2.913761513290171]
  Patient-Centric Knowledge Graphs (PCKGs) represent an important shift in healthcare that focuses on individualized patient care. PCKGs integrate various types of health data to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive understanding of a patient's health. This literature review explores the methodologies, challenges, and opportunities associated with PCKGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T00:07:55Z)
• Clairvoyance: A Pipeline Toolkit for Medical Time Series [95.22483029602921]
  Time-series learning is the bread and butter of data-driven *clinical decision support* Clairvoyance proposes a unified, end-to-end, autoML-friendly pipeline that serves as a software toolkit. Clairvoyance is the first to demonstrate viability of a comprehensive and automatable pipeline for clinical time-series ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:08:03Z)
• Foundation Metrics for Evaluating Effectiveness of Healthcare Conversations Powered by Generative AI [38.497288024393065]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is set to revolutionize healthcare delivery by transforming traditional patient care into a more personalized, efficient, and proactive process. This paper explores state-of-the-art evaluation metrics that are specifically applicable to the assessment of interactive conversational models in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T19:36:48Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• SPeC: A Soft Prompt-Based Calibration on Performance Variability of Large Language Model in Clinical Notes Summarization [50.01382938451978]
  We introduce a model-agnostic pipeline that employs soft prompts to diminish variance while preserving the advantages of prompt-based summarization. Experimental findings indicate that our method not only bolsters performance but also effectively curbs variance for various language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T04:47:46Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.