RPO: Retrieval Preference Optimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13726v1
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:56 GMT
- Title: RPO: Retrieval Preference Optimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Authors: Shi-Qi Yan, Zhen-Hua Ling,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Retrieval Preference Optimization (RPO) to adaptively leverage multi-source knowledge based on retrieval relevance.
RPO is the only RAG-dedicated alignment approach that quantifies the awareness of retrieval relevance in training.
Experiments on four datasets demonstrate that RPO outperforms RAG by 4-10% in accuracy without any extra component.
- Score: 33.85528514353727
- License:
- Abstract: While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has exhibited promise in utilizing external knowledge, its generation process heavily depends on the quality and accuracy of the retrieved context. Large language models (LLMs) struggle to evaluate the correctness of non-parametric knowledge retrieved externally when it differs from internal memorization, leading to knowledge conflicts during response generation. To this end, we introduce the Retrieval Preference Optimization (RPO), a lightweight and effective alignment method to adaptively leverage multi-source knowledge based on retrieval relevance. An implicit representation of retrieval relevance is derived and incorporated into the reward model to integrate retrieval evaluation and response generation into a single model, solving the problem that previous methods necessitate the additional procedure to assess the retrieval quality. Notably, RPO is the only RAG-dedicated alignment approach that quantifies the awareness of retrieval relevance in training, overcoming mathematical obstacles. Experiments on four datasets demonstrate that RPO outperforms RAG by 4-10% in accuracy without any extra component, exhibiting its robust generalization.
Related papers
- DeepRAG: Thinking to Retrieval Step by Step for Large Language Models [92.87532210660456]
We propose DeepRAG, a framework that models retrieval-augmented reasoning as a Markov Decision Process (MDP)
By iteratively decomposing queries, DeepRAG dynamically determines whether to retrieve external knowledge or rely on parametric reasoning at each step.
Experiments show that DeepRAG improves retrieval efficiency while improving answer accuracy by 21.99%, demonstrating its effectiveness in optimizing retrieval-augmented reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T08:22:45Z) - RbFT: Robust Fine-tuning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation against Retrieval Defects [12.5122702720856]
We propose Robust Fine-Tuning (RbFT) to enhance the resilience of large language models against retrieval defects.
Experimental results demonstrate that RbFT significantly improves the robustness of RAG systems across diverse retrieval conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T14:15:09Z) - Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [72.06205327186069]
This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.
Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z) - SUGAR: Leveraging Contextual Confidence for Smarter Retrieval [28.552283701883766]
We introduce Semantic Uncertainty Guided Adaptive Retrieval (SUGAR)
We leverage context-based entropy to actively decide whether to retrieve and to further determine between single-step and multi-step retrieval.
Our empirical results show that selective retrieval guided by semantic uncertainty estimation improves the performance across diverse question answering tasks, as well as achieves a more efficient inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T01:24:59Z) - MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation [34.66546005629471]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are essential tools for various natural language processing tasks but often suffer from generating outdated or incorrect information.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by incorporating external, real-time information retrieval to ground LLM responses.
To tackle this problem, we propose Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MAIN-RAG)
MAIN-RAG is a training-free RAG framework that leverages multiple LLM agents to collaboratively filter and score retrieved documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-31T08:07:26Z) - Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.
We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z) - Retriever-and-Memory: Towards Adaptive Note-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [72.70046559930555]
We propose a generic RAG approach called Adaptive Note-Enhanced RAG (Adaptive-Note) for complex QA tasks.
Specifically, Adaptive-Note introduces an overarching view of knowledge growth, iteratively gathering new information in the form of notes.
In addition, we employ an adaptive, note-based stop-exploration strategy to decide "what to retrieve and when to stop" to encourage sufficient knowledge exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T14:03:29Z) - VERA: Validation and Enhancement for Retrieval Augmented systems [0.0]
We propose textbfVERA (textbfValidation and textbfEnhancement for textbfRetrieval textbfAugmented systems), a system designed to evaluate and enhance the retrieved context before response generation.
VERA employs an evaluator-cum-enhancer LLM that first checks if external retrieval is necessary, evaluates the relevance and redundancy of the retrieved context, and refines it to eliminate non-essential information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T16:10:47Z) - RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.
With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.
Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z) - RE-RAG: Improving Open-Domain QA Performance and Interpretability with Relevance Estimator in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [5.10832476049103]
We propose a relevance estimator (RE) that provides relative relevance between contexts as previous rerankers did.
We show that RE trained with a small generator (sLM) can not only improve the sLM fine-tuned together with RE but also improve previously unreferenced large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T14:11:19Z) - Provably Efficient Iterated CVaR Reinforcement Learning with Function
Approximation and Human Feedback [57.6775169085215]
Risk-sensitive reinforcement learning aims to optimize policies that balance the expected reward and risk.
We present a novel framework that employs an Iterated Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective under both linear and general function approximations.
We propose provably sample-efficient algorithms for this Iterated CVaR RL and provide rigorous theoretical analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-06T08:14:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.