Quantum measurement fitting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02460v2
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:21:28 GMT
- Title: Quantum measurement fitting
- Authors: Pieter Thijs Eendebak,
- Abstract summary: We analyse ordinary-least squares, weighted least squares and maximum-likelihood estimation.<n>We show that using the information on the quantum measurement uncertainty can lead to improved estimation of system parameters.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Quantum measurements are not deterministic. For this reason quantum measurements are repeated for a number of shots on identically prepared systems. The uncertainty in each measurement depends on the number of shots and the expected outcome of the measurement. This information can be used to improve the fitting of models to quantum measurements. In this paper we analyse ordinary-least squares, weighted least squares and maximum-likelihood estimation. We show that using the information on the quantum measurement uncertainty can lead to improved estimation of system parameters. We also introduce the concept of model violation and demonstrate it can be a valuable tool to analyze model assumptions and performance of quantum systems.
Related papers
- Effect of the readout efficiency of quantum measurement on the system entanglement [44.99833362998488]
We quantify the entanglement for a particle on a 1d quantum random walk under inefficient monitoring.
We find that the system's maximal mean entanglement at the measurement-induced quantum-to-classical crossover is in different ways by the measurement strength and inefficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T18:10:05Z) - Metrological power of incompatible measurements [0.8488455943441637]
We show that measurement incompatibility is a necessary resource to enhance the precision of quantum metrology.
We propose a probabilistic method of operational quasiprobability (OQ) consisting of the measuring averages.
We prove that Fisher information (FI), based on positive OQ, can be larger than the conventional quantum FI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T14:10:41Z) - Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [43.80709028066351]
Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system.<n>This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z) - Analysing quantum systems with randomised measurements [0.4179230671838898]
We present the advancements made in utilising randomised measurements in various scenarios of quantum information science.
We describe how to detect and characterise different forms of entanglement, including genuine multipartite entanglement and bound entanglement.
We also present an overview on the estimation of non-linear functions of quantum states and shadow tomography from randomised measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T18:00:01Z) - Quantum Conformal Prediction for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in
Quantum Machine Learning [47.991114317813555]
Quantum models implement implicit probabilistic predictors that produce multiple random decisions for each input through measurement shots.
This paper proposes to leverage such randomness to define prediction sets for both classification and regression that provably capture the uncertainty of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T22:05:21Z) - Quantum measurements and equilibration: the emergence of objective
reality via entropy maximisation [0.0]
We formalise the hypothesis that quantum measurements are driven by the natural tendency of closed systems to maximize entropy.
We lay the groundwork for self-contained models of quantum measurement, proposing improvements to our simple scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T10:06:17Z) - Single-shot quantum measurements sketch quantum many-body states [7.89342891351528]
We propose a nonlinear "measurement energy" based upon the measurement outcomes and an iterative effective-Hamiltonian approach to extract the most probable states.
Our study paves the way towards concepts such as nonlinear-operator Hamiltonian and applications such as parent Hamiltonian reconstruction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-02T19:00:24Z) - Efficient criteria of quantumness for a large system of qubits [58.720142291102135]
We discuss the dimensionless combinations of basic parameters of large, partially quantum coherent systems.
Based on analytical and numerical calculations, we suggest one such number for a system of qubits undergoing adiabatic evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-30T23:50:05Z) - Quantifying Information Extraction using Generalized Quantum
Measurements [0.0]
We show that the same properties hold even when considering generalized measurements.
Observational entropy is a well-defined quantifier determining how influential a given series of measurements is in information extraction.
We discuss observational entropy as a tool for quantum state inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-11T07:31:25Z) - Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations.
We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z) - Quantum probes for universal gravity corrections [62.997667081978825]
We review the concept of minimum length and show how it induces a perturbative term appearing in the Hamiltonian of any quantum system.
We evaluate the Quantum Fisher Information in order to find the ultimate bounds to the precision of any estimation procedure.
Our results show that quantum probes are convenient resources, providing potential enhancement in precision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-13T19:35:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.