Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20728v2
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:50:21 GMT
• Title: Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Zesen Lyu, Dandan Zhang, Wei Ye, Fangdi Li, Zhihang Jiang, Yao Yang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Jigsaw-Puzzles, a novel benchmark consisting of 1,100 carefully curated real-world images with high spatial complexity.<n>Based on this dataset, we design five tasks to rigorously evaluate vision-language models' spatial perception, structural understanding, and reasoning capabilities.<n>The results show that even the strongest model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieves only 77.14% overall accuracy and performs particularly poorly on the Order Generation task.
• Score: 6.569837864665502
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Spatial reasoning is a core component of human cognition, enabling individuals to perceive, comprehend, and interact with the physical world. It relies on a nuanced understanding of spatial structures and inter-object relationships, serving as the foundation for complex reasoning and decision-making. To investigate whether current vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit similar capability, we introduce Jigsaw-Puzzles, a novel benchmark consisting of 1,100 carefully curated real-world images with high spatial complexity. Based on this dataset, we design five tasks to rigorously evaluate VLMs' spatial perception, structural understanding, and reasoning capabilities, while deliberately minimizing reliance on domain-specific knowledge to better isolate and assess the general spatial reasoning capability. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across 24 state-of-the-art VLMs. The results show that even the strongest model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieves only 77.14% overall accuracy and performs particularly poorly on the Order Generation task, with only 30.00% accuracy, far below the performance exceeding 90% achieved by human participants. This persistent gap underscores the need for continued progress, positioning Jigsaw-Puzzles as a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing spatial reasoning research in VLMs. Our project page is at https://zesen01.github.io/jigsaw-puzzles

Related papers

• Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Views [71.57140964322559]
  Our new MindCube benchmark with 21,154 questions across 3,268 images exposes this critical gap.<n>Using MindCube, we evaluate how well Vision Language Models (VLMs) build robust spatial mental models.<n>We then explore three approaches to help VLMs approximate spatial mental models, including unseen intermediate views, natural language reasoning chains, and cognitive maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T16:38:19Z)
• SIRI-Bench: Challenging VLMs' Spatial Intelligence through Complex Reasoning Tasks [53.611256895338585]
  We introduce SIRI-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models' spatial intelligence through video-based reasoning tasks.<n> SIRI-Bench comprises nearly 1K video-question-answer triplets, where each problem is embedded in a realistic 3D scene and captured by video.<n>To facilitate large-scale data synthesis, we develop an Automatic Scene Creation Engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T13:40:00Z)
• PhyBlock: A Progressive Benchmark for Physical Understanding and Planning via 3D Block Assembly [77.33429729761596]
  We introduce PhyBlock, a progressive benchmark to assess vision-language models (VLMs) on physical understanding and planning.<n>PhyBlock integrates a novel four-level cognitive hierarchy assembly task alongside targeted Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples.<n>We benchmark 21 state-of-the-art VLMs, highlighting their strengths and limitations in physically grounded, multi-step planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T11:46:06Z)
• OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models [21.311740507694143]
  We introduce OmniSpatial, a benchmark for spatial reasoning grounded in cognitive psychology.<n>Through Internet data crawling and careful manual annotation, we construct over 1.5K question-answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:58:29Z)
• MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence [50.38961770108891]
  MMSI-Bench is a VQA benchmark dedicated to multi-image spatial intelligence.<n>We conduct extensive experiments and thoroughly evaluate 34 open-source and proprietary MLLMs.<n>The strongest open-source model attains roughly 30% accuracy and OpenAI's o3 reasoning model reaches 40%, while humans score 97%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:52Z)
• ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [47.237216851265316]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models [10.792834356227118]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at identifying and describing objects but struggle with spatial reasoning.<n>Inspired by the dual-pathway (ventral-dorsal) model of human vision, we investigate why VLMs fail spatial tasks despite strong object recognition capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:51:14Z)
• DeepPerception: Advancing R1-like Cognitive Visual Perception in MLLMs for Knowledge-Intensive Visual Grounding [61.26026947423187]
  Human experts excel at fine-grained visual discrimination by leveraging domain knowledge to refine perceptual features.<n>Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to integrate reasoning into visual perception.<n>We propose DeepPerception, an MLLM enhanced with cognitive visual perception capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T04:06:34Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [52.478956204238315]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs [65.93003087656754]
  VisFactor is a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from a well-established cognitive psychology assessment.<n>We evaluate 20 frontier Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) from GPT, Gemini, Claude, LLaMA, Qwen, and SEED families.<n>The best-performing model achieves a score of only 25.19 out of 100, with consistent failures on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T04:21:32Z)
• SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation [7.659514491338669]
  Current vision-language models may grasp basic spatial cues but struggle with the multi-dimensional spatial reasoning necessary for human-like understanding and real-world applications.<n>We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework supported by a new human-annotated dataset.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant deficiencies, especially in reasoning about distance and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)
• Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning [19.399925987942204]
  Vision language models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of downstream tasks.<n>Most tasks rely on the core spatial reasoning capabilities in two-dimensional (2D) environments.<n>We introduce Sparkle: a framework that uses synthetic data generation to provide targeted supervision for vision language models (VLMs) in three basic spatial capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z)
• Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [61.899791071654654]
  We introduce a benchmark, Q-Spatial Bench, with 271 questions across five categories designed for quantitative spatial reasoning. We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on this task. We develop a zero-shot prompting technique, SpatialPrompt, that encourages VLMs to answer quantitative spatial questions using reference objects as visual cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T16:45:42Z)
• SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models [70.01883340129204]
  spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. We present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T01:06:34Z)
• TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial Reasoners [38.406430696146714]
  Top-view perspective denotes a typical way in which humans read and reason over different types of maps. We introduce the TopViewRS dataset, consisting of 11,384 multiple-choice questions with either realistic or semantic top-view map as visual input. We then use it to study and evaluate VLMs across 4 perception and reasoning tasks with different levels of complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T17:55:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.