Quantitative probing: Validating causal models using quantitative domain knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03013v1
• Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:19:11 GMT
• Title: Quantitative probing: Validating causal models using quantitative domain knowledge
• Authors: Daniel Gr\"unbaum, Maike L. Stern, Elmar W. Lang
• Abstract summary: We present quantitative probing as a framework for validating causal models in the presence of quantitative domain knowledge. The method is constructed as an analogue of the train/test split in correlation-based machine learning. The code for integrating quantitative probing into causal analysis is provided in two separate open-source Python packages.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present quantitative probing as a model-agnostic framework for validating causal models in the presence of quantitative domain knowledge. The method is constructed as an analogue of the train/test split in correlation-based machine learning and as an enhancement of current causal validation strategies that are consistent with the logic of scientific discovery. The effectiveness of the method is illustrated using Pearl's sprinkler example, before a thorough simulation-based investigation is conducted. Limits of the technique are identified by studying exemplary failing scenarios, which are furthermore used to propose a list of topics for future research and improvements of the presented version of quantitative probing. The code for integrating quantitative probing into causal analysis, as well as the code for the presented simulation-based studies of the effectiveness of quantitative probing is provided in two separate open-source Python packages.

Related papers

• An extensive simulation study evaluating the interaction of resampling techniques across multiple causal discovery contexts [2.0946534289186842]
  We present theoretical results proving that certain resampling methods emulate the assignment of specific values to algorithm tuning parameters. We also report the results of extensive simulation experiments, which verify the theoretical result and provide substantial data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T17:18:18Z)
• Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
  This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective. The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning. The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z)
• Coarsened confounding for causal effects: a large-sample framework [3.9483979013722683]
  We consider coarsened exact matching, developed in Iacus et al. This methodology is generalized to what we termed as coarsened confounding, for which we propose two new algorithms. A bias correction technique is proposed, and we apply the proposed methodology to data from two well-known observational studi
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T16:47:24Z)
• Exogenous Matching: Learning Good Proposals for Tractable Counterfactual Estimation [1.9662978733004601]
  We propose an importance sampling method for tractable and efficient estimation of counterfactual expressions. By minimizing a common upper bound of counterfactual estimators, we transform the variance minimization problem into a conditional distribution learning problem. We validate the theoretical results through experiments under various types and settings of Structural Causal Models (SCMs) and demonstrate the outperformance on counterfactual estimation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T03:08:28Z)
• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• Predictive Performance Test based on the Exhaustive Nested Cross-Validation for High-dimensional data [7.62566998854384]
  Cross-validation is used for several tasks such as estimating the prediction error, tuning the regularization parameter, and selecting the most suitable predictive model. The K-fold cross-validation is a popular CV method but its limitation is that the risk estimates are highly dependent on the partitioning of the data. This study presents an alternative novel predictive performance test and valid confidence intervals based on exhaustive nested cross-validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T12:28:16Z)
• Seeing Unseen: Discover Novel Biomedical Concepts via Geometry-Constrained Probabilistic Modeling [53.7117640028211]
  We present a geometry-constrained probabilistic modeling treatment to resolve the identified issues. We incorporate a suite of critical geometric properties to impose proper constraints on the layout of constructed embedding space. A spectral graph-theoretic method is devised to estimate the number of potential novel classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T00:56:05Z)
• Globally-Optimal Greedy Experiment Selection for Active Sequential Estimation [1.1530723302736279]
  We study the problem of active sequential estimation, which involves adaptively selecting experiments for sequentially collected data. The goal is to design experiment selection rules for more accurate model estimation. We propose a class of greedy experiment selection methods and provide statistical analysis for the maximum likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T17:09:29Z)
• Causality and Generalizability: Identifiability and Learning Methods [0.0]
  This thesis contributes to the research areas concerning the estimation of causal effects, causal structure learning, and distributionally robust prediction methods. We present novel and consistent linear and non-linear causal effects estimators in instrumental variable settings that employ data-dependent mean squared prediction error regularization. We propose a general framework for distributional robustness with respect to intervention-induced distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T13:12:11Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)
• Bayesian prognostic covariate adjustment [59.75318183140857]
  Historical data about disease outcomes can be integrated into the analysis of clinical trials in many ways. We build on existing literature that uses prognostic scores from a predictive model to increase the efficiency of treatment effect estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T05:19:03Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)
• Marginal likelihood computation for model selection and hypothesis testing: an extensive review [66.37504201165159]
  This article provides a comprehensive study of the state-of-the-art of the topic. We highlight limitations, benefits, connections and differences among the different techniques. Problems and possible solutions with the use of improper priors are also described.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T18:31:58Z)
• Amortized Bayesian Inference for Models of Cognition [0.1529342790344802]
  Recent advances in simulation-based inference using specialized neural network architectures circumvent many previous problems of approximate Bayesian computation. We provide a general introduction to amortized Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T08:12:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.