Collaboration Dynamics and Reliability Challenges of Multi-Agent LLM Systems in Finite Element Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13406v2
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 23:18:21 GMT
• Title: Collaboration Dynamics and Reliability Challenges of Multi-Agent LLM Systems in Finite Element Analysis
• Authors: Chuan Tian, Yilei Zhang,
• Abstract summary: How interagent dynamics influence reasoning quality and verification reliability remains unclear.<n>We study these mechanisms using an AutoGen-based multi-agent framework for linear-elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA)<n>From 1,120 controlled trials, we find that collaboration effectiveness depends more on functional complementarity than team size.
• Score: 3.437656066916039
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly applied to automate computational workflows in science and engineering. However, how inter-agent dynamics influence reasoning quality and verification reliability remains unclear. We study these mechanisms using an AutoGen-based multi-agent framework for linear-elastic Finite Element Analysis (FEA), evaluating seven role configurations across four tasks under a fixed 12-turn conversation limit. From 1,120 controlled trials, we find that collaboration effectiveness depends more on functional complementarity than team size: the three-agent Coder-Executor-Critic configuration uniquely produced physically and visually correct solutions, while adding redundant reviewers reduced success rates. Yet three systematic failure modes persist: (1) affirmation bias, where the Rebuttal agent endorsed rather than challenged outputs (85-92% agreement, including errors); (2) premature consensus caused by redundant reviewers; and (3) a verification-validation gap where executable but physically incorrect code passed undetected. No agent combination successfully validated constitutive relations in complex tasks. Building on theories of functional diversity, role differentiation, and computational validation, we propose actionable design principles: (i) assign complementary agent roles, (ii) enforce multi-level validation (execution, specification, physics), and (iii) prevent early consensus through adversarial or trigger-based interaction control. These findings establish a principled foundation for designing trustworthy LLM collaborations in engineering workflows.

Related papers

• Guided Collaboration in Heterogeneous LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems via Entropy-Based Understanding Assessment and Experience Retrieval [35.96356869281219]
  We describe a counterintuitive phenomenon in the strong-weak system: a strong-weak collaboration may under-perform weak-weak combinations.<n>We propose an Entropy-Based Adaptive Guidance Framework that dynamically aligns the guidance with the cognitive state of each agent.<n>Our approach consistently enhances the effectiveness and stability of heterogeneous collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T07:10:04Z)
• Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
  We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z)
• SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
  SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z)
• Reasoning-Aware Prompt Orchestration: A Foundation Model for Multi-Agent Language Model Coordination [0.0]
  We present a theoretically-grounded framework for dynamic prompt orchestration that enhances reasoning across multiple specialized agents.<n>This framework addresses three core challenges: logical consistency preservation during agent transitions, reasoning-aware prompt adaptation, and scalable coordination of distributed inference.<n> Experimental results on 1,000 synthetic multi-agent conversations demonstrate a 42% reduction in reasoning latency, a 23% improvement in logical consistency measured by ROUGE-L score, and an 89% success rate for task completion without context loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:33:01Z)
• Diagnose, Localize, Align: A Full-Stack Framework for Reliable LLM Multi-Agent Systems under Instruction Conflicts [75.20929587906228]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have rapidly advanced collaborative reasoning, tool use, and role-specialized coordination in complex tasks.<n>However, reliability-critical deployment remains hindered by a systemic failure mode: hierarchical compliance under instruction conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T08:43:34Z)
• AgentInit: Initializing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems via Diversity and Expertise Orchestration for Effective and Efficient Collaboration [35.78052021610084]
  We propose AgentInit, which aims to optimize the structure of agent teams.<n>In addition to multi-round interactions and reflections between agents during agent generation, AgentInit incorporates a Natural Language to Format mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T16:58:54Z)
• Parallelism Meets Adaptiveness: Scalable Documents Understanding in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [0.8437187555622164]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have shown increasing promise for collaborative task completion.<n>Existing multi-agent frameworks often rely on static, fixed roles, and limited inter-agent communication.<n>This paper proposes a coordination framework that enables adaptiveness through three core mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T22:42:51Z)
• Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research [32.92036657863354]
  Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks.<n>However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison.<n>We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and abstraction framework that addresses these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T08:46:23Z)
• Cross-Task Experiential Learning on LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.90193684394165]
  We introduce multi-agent cross-task experiential learning (MAEL), a novel framework that endows LLM-driven agents with explicit cross-task learning and experience accumulation.<n>During the experiential learning phase, we quantify the quality for each step in the task-solving workflow and store the resulting rewards.<n>During inference, agents retrieve high-reward, task-relevant experiences as few-shot examples to enhance the effectiveness of each reasoning step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T07:24:37Z)
• Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration [61.93162413517026]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across diverse downstream tasks, but their monolithic nature restricts scalability and efficiency in complex problem-solving.<n>We propose a puppeteer-style paradigm for LLM-based multi-agent collaboration, where a central orchestrator dynamically directs agents in response to evolving task states.<n> Experiments on closed- and open-domain scenarios show that this method achieves superior performance with reduced computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:02:17Z)
• MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
  Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z)
• Modeling Response Consistency in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Shared and Separate Context Approaches [0.0]
  We introduce the Response Consistency Index (RCI) as a metric to evaluate the effects of context limitations, noise, and inter-agent dependencies on system performance. Our approach differs from existing research by focusing on the interplay between memory constraints and noise management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T21:54:21Z)
• Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions [12.218102495632937]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong potential as agents for tool invocation due to their advanced comprehension and planning capabilities. We propose the Multi-Mission Tool Bench. In the benchmark, each test case comprises multiple interrelated missions. We also propose a novel method to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of agent decisions with dynamic decision trees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T14:21:33Z)
• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models. Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining. We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• API Agents vs. GUI Agents: Divergence and Convergence [35.28490346033735]
  API- and GUI-based large language models (LLMs) interact with graphical user interfaces in a human-like manner. This paper systematically analyzes their divergence and potential convergence. We indicate that continuing innovations in LLM-based automation are poised to blur the lines between API- and GUI-driven agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T04:26:21Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.787341008881036]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors. ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions. Experimental results demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• When Disagreements Elicit Robustness: Investigating Self-Repair Capabilities under LLM Multi-Agent Disagreements [56.29265568399648]
  We argue that disagreements prevent premature consensus and expand the explored solution space.<n>Disagreements on task-critical steps can derail collaboration depending on the topology of solution paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:24:43Z)
• Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications. However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains. To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks. However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback. We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose AOP, a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems. In this study, we identify three critical design principles of agent-oriented planning, including solvability, completeness, and non-redundancy. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advancement of AOP in solving real-world problems compared to both single-agent systems and existing planning strategies for multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
  We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z)
• LLM-Agent-UMF: LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework for Seamless Integration of Multi Active/Passive Core-Agents [0.0]
  We propose a novel LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework (LLM-Agent-UMF) Our framework distinguishes between the different components of an LLM-based agent, setting LLMs and tools apart from a new element, the core-agent. We evaluate our framework by applying it to thirteen state-of-the-art agents, thereby demonstrating its alignment with their functionalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:54:17Z)
• GenAgent: Build Collaborative AI Systems with Automated Workflow Generation -- Case Studies on ComfyUI [64.57616646552869]
  This paper explores collaborative AI systems that use to enhance performance to integrate models, data sources, and pipelines to solve complex and diverse tasks. We introduce GenAgent, an LLM-based framework that automatically generates complex, offering greater flexibility and scalability compared to monolithic models. The results demonstrate that GenAgent outperforms baseline approaches in both run-level and task-level evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T17:44:10Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• CMAT: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Tuning Framework for Enhancing Small Language Models [8.123272461141815]
  We introduce the TinyAgent model, trained on a meticulously curated high-quality dataset. We also present the Collaborative Multi-Agent Tuning (CMAT) framework, an innovative system designed to augment language agent capabilities. In this research, we propose a new communication agent framework that integrates multi-agent systems with environmental feedback mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:07:35Z)
• Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents. There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain. This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z)
• Large Language Model-based Human-Agent Collaboration for Complex Task Solving [94.3914058341565]
  We introduce the problem of Large Language Models (LLMs)-based human-agent collaboration for complex task-solving. We propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Human-Agent Collaboration method, ReHAC. This approach includes a policy model designed to determine the most opportune stages for human intervention within the task-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:03:36Z)
• Solution-oriented Agent-based Models Generation with Verifier-assisted Iterative In-context Learning [10.67134969207797]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) stand as an essential paradigm for proposing and validating hypothetical solutions or policies. Large language models (LLMs) encapsulating cross-domain knowledge and programming proficiency could potentially alleviate the difficulty of this process. We present SAGE, a general solution-oriented ABM generation framework designed for automatic modeling and generating solutions for targeted problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T07:59:06Z)
• MechAgents: Large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledge [0.6708125191843434]
  A set of AI agents can solve mechanics tasks, here demonstrated for elasticity problems, via autonomous collaborations. A two-agent team can effectively write, execute and self-correct code, in order to apply finite element methods to solve classical elasticity problems. For more complex tasks, we construct a larger group of agents with enhanced division of labor among planning, formulating, coding, executing and criticizing the process and results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T13:49:03Z)
• TPTU: Large Language Model-based AI Agents for Task Planning and Tool Usage [28.554981886052953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for various real-world applications. Despite their prowess, intrinsic generative abilities of LLMs may prove insufficient for handling complex tasks. This paper proposes a structured framework tailored for LLM-based AI Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T09:22:03Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.